|
Toxic Christianity, a precursor to Transhumanism?
under 700 words, May 2022
Many of those joining us in the struggle against transhumanism, deep corruption and the destruction of liberty make appeal to what they call Christian values. This applies in particular to voices from North America. In the face of great evil — whether this term be understood metaphysically or metaphorically — they are our allies. This said, much of the rot can be attributed to the incoherence of Christianity. Neither Scripture nor the tradition of thought called Christian provides much of a moral compass. Scripture fails because any quote can be interpreted variously, or else in its vastness is contradicted elsewhere. This also applies if Scripture is held to cover only the New Testament, not the Old. The tradition fails because it has been through so many metamorphoses, from early century radicalism through the oppression constituted by monastic life and into Puritanism, with their different conceptions of salvation and sacrifice.
Christian churches are largely compromised, having complied with confinement and its accompanying measures, even having been eager to suppress common liberties and community. Closer to Evil than to Good.
The values we are trying to rescue are those of the Enlightenment, which cannot be reduced to a set of doctrines. The Enlightenment draws on a commitment to the search for truth and to the force of reason, while accepting that our faculty of reason runs up against limits, not least because we have different ways of thinking about different things. It is set against megalomania and hubris. It is opposed to the concentration of power and therefore upholds systems of checks & balances.
One question to be addressed is how so many in key positions have chosen falsehood over truth and indulged in absurdities. We are not talking about legitimate differences of opinion.
How do these people live with themselves? But they are clearly devoid of conscience. Conscience involves a sense of self and consistency, with a direction of travel towards greater maturity, and honesty. (None of these concepts can be understood individually, by analytic means alone. They must be understood as interconnected, i.e. synthetically.)
One answer to that question (i.e. the origins of so much falsehood) is that the much-vaunted Christian tradition has always failed to be coherent. Despite Jesus, it falls back on convention. The recourse to rules and codes, which has become dominant in public life, has actually weakened moral fibre because it absolves people of individual responsibility for the rules they live by and does nothing to strengthen the faculty of judgement. As faith in any ultimate (metaphysical) authority has waned, it has been replaced by a crude conformism and by materialism. (Most of those claiming to be Christians have betrayed the saying of Jesus that the Law was made for Man, not Man for the Law.)
In certain circles, convention has come to tolerate (even welcome) the acceptance of bribes, or else has come to leave people vulnerable to intimidation. But this is only part of the explanation. It would seem that persons of weak character and compromised persons (i.e. subject to blackmail) have been placed in positions of power and have been obeying instructions. How else is the absurdity of their pronouncements and conduct to be explained? It can only be down to conspiracy, or conspiracies.
In a better world, people would only accede to positions of power gradually, having matured, which will mean after being tested over many years for both their character and judgement. An important principle here is that no profession can police itself, each profession must be policed by members of different professions. What we now witness, however, is that the procedures have long filtered out the best and the bravest. Something which has continued at pace since early 2020.
It is vain to imagine that bad people can be eliminated. But what can be done is to have procedures in place which prevent them from taking the high ground, which is what has happened. Any such procedures will need review and possibly regeneration with each new generation.
______________-------------------________________
In review ten years later, i.e. 2025, the „Direction of Travel“ of my German book on “Responsibility with Class” has proven right, but belated. The rot had already gone much deeper than I or almost anyone envisaged.
With time, I shall address some of this (and conceivable remedies) provisionally in the third section of the KlasseV site, namely “Endtimes.”
The situation is dire, with our civilisation facing extinction.
What has emerged is that there has long been a concealed civil war, with powerful forces working against not only the mass of people in each of our countries, but against Enlightenment principles we had considered inviolable.
Except for those hellbent on blindness, that civil war ceased to be hidden in 2020.
There was no pandemic, not even an illness. The horror stories were staged. The “measures” served to conjure up fear and isolation; also to harm the new generation.
It gets worse. Many, maybe half, maybe more, of the terrorist attacks over the decades and even very recently were organised by our own secret (“intelligence”) services.
Most people are still unaware of this betrayal. The fault lies with the mass media, which have been captured. Whereas these were allowed some leeway to report truthfully prior to 2020, since then they have been wholly mendacious. It may be surmised that most journalists and their editors had long been hired on the premise that they would tow the line of feeding readers with sensationalist stories rather than in-depth coverage.
Meanwhile the machinery of political parties has gone from strength to strength. My “Fuzzy Democracy” (see the separate site: fuzzydemocracy.eu) has failed to make progress, despite my countless efforts to publicise it. “Fuzzy Democracy” would create, would have created, a counterweight to political parties and the concentration of power they embody.
It gets worse. It is widely speculated, and not without evidence, that most political representatives and appointees are subject to blackmail. Sinister forces have devastating information on them, some of it about repugnant sexual practices. This would be the motivation for their refusal to debate or even to listen to the allegations, long since proven, that, for example, all vaccinations are harmful. This said, some are likely just steeped in the kind of prejudices shared by many in the masses, including the well-educated and academic masses.
It gets worse. In many countries, the judiciary is corrupt. Judges, public prosecutors and some lawyers would seem to have been promoted on the basis of being men & women of weak, indeed perverse, character and judgement. There is no democratic remedy such as could take the form of deselection by popular vote.
But this remedy itself would be useless except in the presence of robust reporting in the press and other media. With major broadcasters and newspapers captured, as mentioned above, such robust reporting cannot be relied upon, and the reach of alternative independent journalists is limited.
Censorship of the written and spoken word is rampant. This is the gravest of sins. (The censorship of images and especially of moving images, as in child pornography, is another matter.)
The Enlightenment principle of free speech is that we do not come to blows about differences of opinion, for example, whether or not there are viruses. Dissenters and mainstream advocates alike are afforded protection from violence. Morally, this respect ends where there is recourse to censorship. Legal defences stretch only as far as the closest policeman.
But it gets worse. “Science” has been replaced by its opposite: “Scientism.” We are now routinely supplied with the best science Money can buy. This applies most prominently to the medical establishment and the pharmaceutical industry. The scientific journals, too, have been captured; peer review has become a misnomer. Much of science is a racket, a cash cow, serving only to make a pretence of work in order to keep the pay coming in.
It gets worse. The schools are miseducating our children, with, for the few who can manage it, the alternative of home schooling coming under bureaucratic attack. The miseducation consists not only in age-inappropriate indoctrination in matters sexual, but embodies also the denial of common sense about climate change, terrorising young minds. It does not end there. There are persistent and plausible reports of secretive family courts in many countries conspiring to remove children from parental protection on the flimsiest of pretexts. To what end? Not only to generate income for the legal profession and for institutional adoptions, but, it is alleged with evidence, so that the children are to be sexually abused. Once done, they can be a resource for organ harvesting.
Other issues are
* the imposition of Electro-Magnetic Radiation (EMF) through 5G and 6G towers. Significant cause of cancer and other ailments in addition to harm to the animal and even the plant world
* the implanting of nanotechnology in bodies and brains, be it through vaccination, shedding, or chemtrails
* the destruction of the natural world by selfsame chemtrails and cloud seeding
* deliberate destruction of farming, for example, by scare stories of “bird flu” and “swine flu.” The only purpose of culling can be to lead to a situation where, eventually, people starve to death. Evidently, the wrong species are being culled.
* suspicion of electoral fraud (i.e. in counting & reporting votes even within the already rigged choices available)
* pursuit of war (e.g. in Ukraine) without any remotely plausible justification
* invasion by men of military age from totally alien cultures (one obvious counter-measure would be forced sterilisation, loudly publicised in advance, of such men)
|
|